Morningstar
Personal Finance

How advisors can help clients right now

Each day’s news around COVID-19 market volatility can lead to financial anxiety for you and your clients - here's how to navigate it

Steve Wendel 17 March, 2020 | 1:25AM
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size

Man looking out of window

After headlines noting “the biggest daily stock market drop in oil prices since the Gulf War” and “the S&P 500 ETF’s third-worst opening in history,” it’s only natural for investors to fear what comes next. And given how our minds judge probability and forecast the future, it’s understandable to want to pull out of funds.

It can be easier to successfully navigate moments like this if you understand the particular causes of investors’ financial anxiety. Instead of asking yourself if a client is doing the right thing, it’s more fruitful to ask, “Why do they want to do this?”

How market volatility impacts investor behavior
Reactions to market volatility can be attributed to a couple of behavioral phenomena.

1. Our minds use the recent and vivid past as a guide. We’re all hard-wired to see things that readily come to mind as indicative of the future. For example, research from Amos Tvserky and Daniel Kahneman showed that the most vivid and recent things—like a drop in the stock market—are far more compelling than events in the distant past.

On a fundamental level, this applies to everyday life. If we see a car coming straight at us, we don’t recite to ourselves, “Past performance doesn’t predict future performance. Therefore, the car is going to swerve. I’m safe.” No, we take the recent and vivid past as a guide for what’s going to happen next. In investing, that’s sometimes referred to as recency bias. Our first instinct isn’t to  think about how markets recovered from the crash of 1987 or the dot com bust—it’s to think about what has been lost within the last couple weeks.

2. We watch how others respond. There is another cognitive bias in which we tend to follow others when we aren’t sure what do to (for example, this was explored in Jessica Nolan’s paper “Normative Social Influence is Underdetected”). It’s hard to go against social norms, and we fear rejection if we do.

In everyday life, when we don’t have good information of our own, it can be quite reasonable to follow the group. But when it comes to investing, these biases can lead us astray. Assuming that short-term market volatility is going to lead to a long-term, permanent loss of capital isn’t useful. In fact, it’s often the opposite. And in investing, if the herd is acting according to that belief, there may actually be better opportunity for investors  in another direction.

Recency bias and herding behavior are egged on by the headlines and social-media doom that accompanies market volatility, making them feel more real and immediate than a carefully considered, long-term plan from years ago.

As an advisor, you can have a calm, rational discussion with a client experiencing financial anxiety about how the market instability is probably going to be overblown. But if the client’s neighbor is screaming about how we’re headed for another recession, that overrides everything else.

How advisors can address financial anxiety
Vividness is often one of the reasons that we get anxious about market volatility. The more vivid a downturn is, the more real it feels.

So, you can fight vivid with vivid. Offer a vivid example of other investors who gave in to herding behavior during the market downturns of the SARS scare or Zika outbreak and ended up losing out on substantial gains in the aftermath. The intent isn’t to scare people, but to make the outcomes clear and powerful.

Then give a vivid, real, personable example about the people who stuck to their long-term plans through one of these scares and ultimately thrived. The abstract is useless. It’s about how well you can help a client visualize the person who had the right approach to handling market volatility.

 

Are you getting the right returns?

Get our free equity indexes to benchmark your portfolio here

TAGS
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size

About Author

Steve Wendel

Steve Wendel  Steve Wendel is head of behavioral science for Morningstar, where he leads a team of behavioral scientists and practitioners who conduct original research to help people invest and manage their money more effectively.

© Copyright 2023 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use        Privacy Policy       Disclosures        Accessibility

The Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks is assigned based on an analyst's estimate of a stocks fair value. It is projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Morningstar assigns star ratings based on an analyst’s estimate of a stock's fair value. Four components drive the Star Rating: (1) our assessment of the firm’s economic moat, (2) our estimate of the stock’s fair value, (3) our uncertainty around that fair value estimate and (4) the current market price. This process culminates in a single-point star rating that is updated daily. A 5-star represents a belief that the stock is a good value at its current price; a 1-star stock isn't. If our base-case assumptions are true the market price will converge on our fair value estimate over time, generally within three years. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks, please visit here

Quantitative Fair Value Estimate represents Morningstar’s estimate of the per share dollar amount that a company’s equity is worth today. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is based on a statistical model derived from the Fair Value Estimate Morningstar’s equity analysts assign to companies which includes a financial forecast of the company. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is calculated daily. It is a projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Quantiative Fair Value Estimate, please visit here

The Morningstar Medalist Rating is the summary expression of Morningstar’s forward-looking analysis of investment strategies as offered via specific vehicles using a rating scale of Gold, Silver, Bronze, Neutral, and Negative. The Medalist Ratings indicate which investments Morningstar believes are likely to outperform a relevant index or peer group average on a risk-adjusted basis over time. Investment products are evaluated on three key pillars (People, Parent, and Process) which, when coupled with a fee assessment, forms the basis for Morningstar’s conviction in those products’ investment merits and determines the Medalist Rating they’re assigned. Pillar ratings take the form of Low, Below Average, Average, Above Average, and High. Pillars may be evaluated via an analyst’s qualitative assessment (either directly to a vehicle the analyst covers or indirectly when the pillar ratings of a covered vehicle are mapped to a related uncovered vehicle) or using algorithmic techniques. Vehicles are sorted by their expected performance into rating groups defined by their Morningstar Category and their active or passive status. When analysts directly cover a vehicle, they assign the three pillar ratings based on their qualitative assessment, subject to the oversight of the Analyst Rating Committee, and monitor and reevaluate them at least every 14 months. When the vehicles are covered either indirectly by analysts or by algorithm, the ratings are assigned monthly. For more detailed information about these ratings, including their methodology, please go to here

The Morningstar Medalist Ratings are not statements of fact, nor are they credit or risk ratings. The Morningstar Medalist Rating (i) should not be used as the sole basis in evaluating an investment product, (ii) involves unknown risks and uncertainties which may cause expectations not to occur or to differ significantly from what was expected, (iii) are not guaranteed to be based on complete or accurate assumptions or models when determined algorithmically, (iv) involve the risk that the return target will not be met due to such things as unforeseen changes in changes in management, technology, economic development, interest rate development, operating and/or material costs, competitive pressure, supervisory law, exchange rate, tax rates, exchange rate changes, and/or changes in political and social conditions, and (v) should not be considered an offer or solicitation to buy or sell the investment product. A change in the fundamental factors underlying the Morningstar Medalist Rating can mean that the rating is subsequently no longer accurate.

For information on the historical Morningstar Medalist Rating for any managed investment Morningstar covers, please contact your local Morningstar office.

For more detailed information about conflicts of interest, including EU MAR disclosures, please see the “Morningstar Medalist Rating Analyst Conflict of Interest & Other Disclosures for EMEA”here

Select Your Site Edition To make sure the site is relevant to you, we need to know if you’re an individual investor or a financial professional.