Three stocks to avoid

These stocks are all in the red this year yet continue to trade above our estimates of their fair value.

Susan Dziubinski 28 December, 2017 | 6:00PM
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

In an article two weeks ago I put the spotlight on stocks that have returned twice as much as the S&P 500 this year, yet still looked undervalued according to Morningstar's estimates of their fair values. These stocks have more room to run, in our opinion.

This week, we're taking a look at stocks through the opposite lens, focusing on those that have underperformed the market in 2017, yet still look overpriced according to Morningstar's estimates of their fair values. In our opinion, these would be stocks to avoid.

Specifically, I screened for stocks that have lost money this year and that are trading in 1- or 2-star range, which suggests they're overvalued. I then narrowed the search further to companies with wide or narrow economic moat ratings. Here is a detailed look at three of the names that made the list.

 Conagra Brands (CAG)
Year-to-date return: -2.21%
Rating: 2 stars
Economic moat: Narrow
Uncertainty: Medium

Having split from its commercial foods business last year, Conagra today focuses on selling products in the meals, additives and snack aisles. Its portfolio includes brands such as Marie Callender's, Banquet and Hunts. And although the narrow-moat firm has wrapped up several sensible strategic actions over the past two years, Morningstar sector director Erin Lash remains skeptical on the stock.

"Despite management's contention that this will allow for more focused execution, we aren't convinced this strategy will bolster its intangible assets -- the source of our narrow moat," writes Lash in her latest analyst report.

For starters, says Lash, Conagra's portfolio is stuffed with second- and third-tier brands with little pricing power. And while the company is bringing new products to market and reducing promotions in an effort to improve brand equity, volume degradation during the past few years illustrates how challenging this will be. Lastly, CEO Sean Connolly's focus on brand mix, cutting costs and fueling brand investments may have worked while he was at Hillshire Brands, but is, in Lash's mind, less likely to work here, given Conagra's weaker competitive positioning relative to its closest peers.

Although Morningstar assigns Conagra a narrow economic moat, that moat is eroding.

"Competitive pressures abound, and we don't believe its mix has mustered much clout, impairing its negotiating leverage with retailers," says Lash.

 Core Laboratories (CLB)
Year-to-date return: -8.33%
Rating: 2 stars
Economic moat: Wide
Uncertainty: High

There's plenty to like about Core Laboratories as a company.

"We have long believed that Core Laboratories is one of the highest-quality oilfield service companies," writes Morningstar analyst Preston Caldwell in his latest report. "For one, with a wide-moat rating, Core Lab possesses the strongest moat across our entire oilfield service coverage. The company's foundational core analysis business in the reservoir description segment, in particular, has been virtually unchallenged over the past three decades."

Yet despite the company's moat being stable, Morningstar recently lowered its fair value estimate on the shares to US$80, reflecting diminished long-term growth prospects for the company. Based on that estimate, shares are about 20% overvalued today.

But being overvalued is nothing new for these shares.

"This overvaluation likely stems from a misconception about how Core Lab's moat translates into a valuation premium," Caldwell says. "The market has long rightfully agreed with our view (reflected in our wide-moat rating) that Core Lab will earn high returns on capital for many years to come. Yet, such a view does not necessarily mean that Core Lab should be valued at a high multiple to fully recovered earnings, as is currently the case."

Only high returns on capital combined with sustained earnings growth can justify such a large premium multiple to earnings, he concludes.

 F5 Networks (FFIV)
Year-to-date return: -8.54%
Rating: 2 stars
Economic moat: Narrow
Uncertainty: Medium

 Cisco's (CSCO) exit from the application delivery controller market solidified F5 Networks' leadership position. IT managers are reluctant to switch to competing products in this area, in part due to the complexity of deployment and the body of support F5 provides. Thanks to its significant market share and brand strength, F5 Networks earns a narrow-moat rating.

"While  Citrix Systems (CTXS) and Radware (RDWR) remain strong competitors, we do not foresee any drastic market share realignment among these players," notes analyst Ilya Kundozerov in his latest report. "The more important factor to consider is the tectonic shift in the industry, with the increasing stream of applications and workloads that are leaving the on-premise data centre in favour of cloud computing."

Despite its narrow moat rating, Morningstar believes the company's moat trend is negative. The firm's market share had steadily declined, notes Kundozerov, and its core ADC market has already peaked. Moreover, the growth of various cloud-based solutions threatens the company's margins in the long run.

"While the firm expects sequential revenue growth in fiscal 2018, starting from the first quarter, we think that we are going to see gradual gross margin erosion stemming from low-cost, cloud-native application delivery controller offerings," he says.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Securities Mentioned in Article

Security NamePriceChange (%)Morningstar Rating
Cisco Systems Inc47.38 USD1.41Rating
Conagra Brands Inc28.91 USD1.44Rating
Core Laboratories Inc18.24 USD-0.38Rating
F5 Inc169.58 USD-0.09Rating
Radware Ltd18.41 USD2.02

About Author

Susan Dziubinski

Susan Dziubinski  Susan Dziubinski is director of content for

© Copyright 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use        Privacy Policy       Disclosures        Accessibility