Morningstar
Education

Quant Concepts: Will the dividends last?

You might be holding dividend-paying stocks, but you should see what dividend-growing stocks do in the long term with CPMS's Emily Halverson-Duncan

Emily Halverson-Duncan 28 February, 2020 | 1:11AM
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size

 

 

See more episodes of Quant Concepts here 

Emily Halverson-Duncan: Welcome to Quant Concepts. With many Canadians holding dividend-paying stocks, it's important to ensure they're looking for the right companies that can withstand different market environments and unexpected shocks to the economy. We've seen in recent days market sliding, so now is a good time to review your portfolio and make sure you're set up for success over the long term.

This is one of the reasons why it's important to distinguish between dividend-paying stocks and dividend-growing stocks. Dividend-paying stocks are just that – stocks that pay a dividend. Whereas dividend growers not only pay a dividend but also have a track record of increasing their dividends consistently over time. These stocks are typically more stable in nature and are less likely to be as heavily affected by fluctuations in the market. So, let's take a look at how to build this model.

First off, we're going to rank our Canadian universe of stocks which today holds 700 stocks. And the factors we're going to use to rank are five-year normalized dividend growth. So, it looks at whether or not a company has been growing their dividends across the last five years in an annualized number. We want higher values there. Expected dividend growth is what the company is expected to grow in the next one year, so what they're projecting and announcing that they will be paying in dividends compared to what they previously paid. Quarterly earnings surprise, a little bit of a momentum kick that we're adding in there. So, whether or not they're outperforming based on what they've announced they will be – or what analysts are expecting they're going to be projecting for earnings.

One of our first screens here is five-year normalized dividend growth. We want that to have a value in the top third of peers. So, what that means is a value of 9.22% or higher. We want our expected dividend growth to be positive. And we want our dividend payout ratio, which looks at how much of their earnings were paying out as dividends, to be less than or equal to 75%. The reason we do that is to make sure that they're not paying out too much of their earnings in dividends and still have some leftover to actually grow the company. On the sell side, we're going to sell stocks who have a five-year dividend growth in the bottom half of peers. So, right now, that's a value of 3.08% or lower, and stocks that have a payout ratio above 80%. So, again, they're paying out too much at that point in dividends to not actually be growing the business themselves.

So, now let's see how the model did over the long term. Here, we're going to run a 15-stock back test from January 2004 until January 2020.

Okay. So, the model returned 12.9% across that time period, which is a performance of 5.4% against the benchmark, which in this case is the S&P/TSX Composite. Turnover, which looks at how often you're trading stocks, was very low at 32%. So, what that means is on 15 stocks, you'd be trading roughly a third of them each year, give or take some years could be a bit higher, some years could be a bit lower. Some of the metrics I always like to look at – downside deviation, which looks at the volatility of negative returns for the strategy was 7% and the benchmark was 8.5. So, it is a lower downside deviation here indicating that this model is better at withstanding volatility than the average benchmark.

My favourite chart that I like to look at, this green and blue chart here, looks at how the model did in both up and down markets. In up markets, the model outperformed 52% of the time, whereas, in down markets, it actually outperformed 71% of the time. So, there's a lot more of a focus you can see here on downside protection rather than just trying to ride the upswings of the market. So, for those of you that are investing in dividend stocks, maybe worthwhile looking at whether or not your companies are just paying dividends or whether they're growing them across the long term.

For Morningstar, I'm Emily Halverson-Duncan.

Investing in the sustainable economy

Learn about the companies best positioned to survive and thrive in the low-carbon future

TAGS
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size

About Author

Emily Halverson-Duncan  Emily is Director, CPMS Sales at Morningstar

© Copyright 2023 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use        Privacy Policy       Disclosures        Accessibility

The Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks is assigned based on an analyst's estimate of a stocks fair value. It is projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Morningstar assigns star ratings based on an analyst’s estimate of a stock's fair value. Four components drive the Star Rating: (1) our assessment of the firm’s economic moat, (2) our estimate of the stock’s fair value, (3) our uncertainty around that fair value estimate and (4) the current market price. This process culminates in a single-point star rating that is updated daily. A 5-star represents a belief that the stock is a good value at its current price; a 1-star stock isn't. If our base-case assumptions are true the market price will converge on our fair value estimate over time, generally within three years. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks, please visit here

Quantitative Fair Value Estimate represents Morningstar’s estimate of the per share dollar amount that a company’s equity is worth today. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is based on a statistical model derived from the Fair Value Estimate Morningstar’s equity analysts assign to companies which includes a financial forecast of the company. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is calculated daily. It is a projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Quantiative Fair Value Estimate, please visit here

The Morningstar Medalist Rating is the summary expression of Morningstar’s forward-looking analysis of investment strategies as offered via specific vehicles using a rating scale of Gold, Silver, Bronze, Neutral, and Negative. The Medalist Ratings indicate which investments Morningstar believes are likely to outperform a relevant index or peer group average on a risk-adjusted basis over time. Investment products are evaluated on three key pillars (People, Parent, and Process) which, when coupled with a fee assessment, forms the basis for Morningstar’s conviction in those products’ investment merits and determines the Medalist Rating they’re assigned. Pillar ratings take the form of Low, Below Average, Average, Above Average, and High. Pillars may be evaluated via an analyst’s qualitative assessment (either directly to a vehicle the analyst covers or indirectly when the pillar ratings of a covered vehicle are mapped to a related uncovered vehicle) or using algorithmic techniques. Vehicles are sorted by their expected performance into rating groups defined by their Morningstar Category and their active or passive status. When analysts directly cover a vehicle, they assign the three pillar ratings based on their qualitative assessment, subject to the oversight of the Analyst Rating Committee, and monitor and reevaluate them at least every 14 months. When the vehicles are covered either indirectly by analysts or by algorithm, the ratings are assigned monthly. For more detailed information about these ratings, including their methodology, please go to here

The Morningstar Medalist Ratings are not statements of fact, nor are they credit or risk ratings. The Morningstar Medalist Rating (i) should not be used as the sole basis in evaluating an investment product, (ii) involves unknown risks and uncertainties which may cause expectations not to occur or to differ significantly from what was expected, (iii) are not guaranteed to be based on complete or accurate assumptions or models when determined algorithmically, (iv) involve the risk that the return target will not be met due to such things as unforeseen changes in changes in management, technology, economic development, interest rate development, operating and/or material costs, competitive pressure, supervisory law, exchange rate, tax rates, exchange rate changes, and/or changes in political and social conditions, and (v) should not be considered an offer or solicitation to buy or sell the investment product. A change in the fundamental factors underlying the Morningstar Medalist Rating can mean that the rating is subsequently no longer accurate.

For information on the historical Morningstar Medalist Rating for any managed investment Morningstar covers, please contact your local Morningstar office.

For more detailed information about conflicts of interest, including EU MAR disclosures, please see the “Morningstar Medalist Rating Analyst Conflict of Interest & Other Disclosures for EMEA”here

Select Your Site Edition To make sure the site is relevant to you, we need to know if you’re an individual investor or a financial professional.