Morningstar
Market Insights

A Value Stock Rebound Is Good News for Dividend Investors

Equity income is well-positioned, both short- and long-term.

Dan Lefkovitz 11 January, 2021 | 4:28AM
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size

Compass on a newspaper

Dividend investors, like so many others, experienced 2020 as an annus horribilis. The pandemic-driven economic downturn prompted a raft of companies to cut or suspend planned payouts to shareholders. While the Morningstar Global Markets Index showed equities across developed and developing markets advancing 16% in US dollar terms in 2020, the Morningstar Global Dividend Yield Focus Index declined half a percentage point for the year. Dividend payers underperformed during the first quarter’s painful bear market then lagged when stocks bounced back.

But in November, dividend payers mounted a comeback. The Morningstar Global Dividend Yield Focus Index gained nearly 10% between 8th November and the year’s end, in line with the broad market.

Growth of $10,000

The dividend index has also yielded more than 4% over the past year. That more than doubled the yield for the global equity benchmark and towers over the income paid by most developed market government bonds these days.

Trailing 12-Month Yield (%)

Dividend-paying stocks still have lots of catching up to do. But a market rotation to value stocks is good news for equity income investors. Meanwhile, the long-term case for dividend-paying stocks remains solid.

Dividends Caught in a Value Meltdown
Dividend-paying stocks tend to cluster toward the value side of the equity market. Companies in slower-growing sectors like consumer defensive, utilities, energy, and financial services, are likelier to pay out cash to shareholders than in faster growing areas such as technology. The Morningstar Global Dividend Yield Focus Index lands in the large-value segment of the Morningstar Style Box, where most equity income strategies sit.

That value bias was a huge problem for dividend payers for the first 10 months of 2020. The pandemic-driven downturn hit many value-leaning sectors hard. Consumer-oriented companies plummeted. Energy stocks suffered from falling demand and a price war among oil producers. Financials fell due to low interest rates and loan losses. Even utilities stocks, which had been prized in recent years for their rich yields, retreated on an anticipation of lower electricity use by industrial and commercial customers. Unsurprisingly, dividend cutters clustered in oil and gas, consumer-related areas, and anything related to travel.

Meanwhile, technology companies benefited from work-from-home, learn-from-home, shop-from-home trends. In 2020, the market value of semiconductor maker Nvidia surpassed that of Nestle. The gulf between growth stocks and value stocks came to resemble the heights of the dot-com bubble of 1999.

The Morningstar Global Dividend Yield Focus Index suffered for most of 2020 both for what it held and what it didn’t. Constituents like Exxon, Shell, HSBC, and BASF struggled mightily. Meanwhile, not including Apple, Amazon, and Tencent held it back relative to the global equity market.

Then came November. Promising vaccine results raised hopes for an end to the pandemic. The market saw the U.S. election outcome as benign. Expectations of economic recovery lifted many beaten-down sectors. Dividend stocks soared as the value side of the stock market recovered. The Morningstar Global Dividend Yield Focus Index was boosted by soaring energy and bank stocks, vaccine maker Pfizer, and Asian technology leaders Samsung Electronics and Taiwan Semiconductor.

Morningstar Global Dividend Yield Focus Index - Top 10 Constituents' 2020 Performance

What About Dividends Going Forward?
Whether the dividend renaissance continues, only time will tell. From a valuation perspective, the market seems to be offering more upside within dividend-paying value sectors than on the growth side of the market. As 2021 begins, Morningstar Equity Research sees the most attractively valued sector as energy and the most overvalued as technology. Economic recovery would be good news for economically sensitive areas, where many dividend payers ply their trade. Low interest rates are likely to continue to push many income investors into equities.  

Meanwhile, the long-term case for dividend payers remains strong. Not only does a significant portion of the long-term total return from equities come from reinvested dividends and dividend growth, but dividend payers have posted a strong track record relative to non-payers and the overall market. Companies that return cash to shareholders tend to be solid businesses. Committing to a regular payout instills discipline.

But dividend payers should be approached selectively. The market’s highest yielders are often troubled companies that turn out to be dividend traps. Investors who blindly chase yield can end up sacrificing returns. Dividends aren’t guaranteed and their sustainability must be always be gauged. The Morningstar Global Dividend Yield Focus Index, for example, focuses on high-yielders but screens them for quality and financial health.

Are You Getting The Right Returns?

Get our free equity indexes to benchmark your portfolio here

TAGS
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size

About Author

Dan Lefkovitz

Dan Lefkovitz  Dan Lefkovitz is a strategist for Morningstar's Indexes group.

© Copyright 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use        Privacy Policy       Disclosures        Accessibility

The Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks is assigned based on an analyst's estimate of a stocks fair value. It is projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Morningstar assigns star ratings based on an analyst’s estimate of a stock's fair value. Four components drive the Star Rating: (1) our assessment of the firm’s economic moat, (2) our estimate of the stock’s fair value, (3) our uncertainty around that fair value estimate and (4) the current market price. This process culminates in a single-point star rating that is updated daily. A 5-star represents a belief that the stock is a good value at its current price; a 1-star stock isn't. If our base-case assumptions are true the market price will converge on our fair value estimate over time, generally within three years. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks, please visit here

Quantitative Fair Value Estimate represents Morningstar’s estimate of the per share dollar amount that a company’s equity is worth today. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is based on a statistical model derived from the Fair Value Estimate Morningstar’s equity analysts assign to companies which includes a financial forecast of the company. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is calculated daily. It is a projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Quantiative Fair Value Estimate, please visit here

The Morningstar Medalist Rating is the summary expression of Morningstar’s forward-looking analysis of investment strategies as offered via specific vehicles using a rating scale of Gold, Silver, Bronze, Neutral, and Negative. The Medalist Ratings indicate which investments Morningstar believes are likely to outperform a relevant index or peer group average on a risk-adjusted basis over time. Investment products are evaluated on three key pillars (People, Parent, and Process) which, when coupled with a fee assessment, forms the basis for Morningstar’s conviction in those products’ investment merits and determines the Medalist Rating they’re assigned. Pillar ratings take the form of Low, Below Average, Average, Above Average, and High. Pillars may be evaluated via an analyst’s qualitative assessment (either directly to a vehicle the analyst covers or indirectly when the pillar ratings of a covered vehicle are mapped to a related uncovered vehicle) or using algorithmic techniques. Vehicles are sorted by their expected performance into rating groups defined by their Morningstar Category and their active or passive status. When analysts directly cover a vehicle, they assign the three pillar ratings based on their qualitative assessment, subject to the oversight of the Analyst Rating Committee, and monitor and reevaluate them at least every 14 months. When the vehicles are covered either indirectly by analysts or by algorithm, the ratings are assigned monthly. For more detailed information about these ratings, including their methodology, please go to here

The Morningstar Medalist Ratings are not statements of fact, nor are they credit or risk ratings. The Morningstar Medalist Rating (i) should not be used as the sole basis in evaluating an investment product, (ii) involves unknown risks and uncertainties which may cause expectations not to occur or to differ significantly from what was expected, (iii) are not guaranteed to be based on complete or accurate assumptions or models when determined algorithmically, (iv) involve the risk that the return target will not be met due to such things as unforeseen changes in changes in management, technology, economic development, interest rate development, operating and/or material costs, competitive pressure, supervisory law, exchange rate, tax rates, exchange rate changes, and/or changes in political and social conditions, and (v) should not be considered an offer or solicitation to buy or sell the investment product. A change in the fundamental factors underlying the Morningstar Medalist Rating can mean that the rating is subsequently no longer accurate.

For information on the historical Morningstar Medalist Rating for any managed investment Morningstar covers, please contact your local Morningstar office.

For more detailed information about conflicts of interest, including EU MAR disclosures, please see the “Morningstar Medalist Rating Analyst Conflict of Interest & Other Disclosures for EMEA”here

Select Your Site Edition To make sure the site is relevant to you, we need to know if you’re an individual investor or a financial professional.